Nope, we still do not have that kind of visibility, and no clear plan is available.
Yet, it doesn’t mean there is no improvement and there is an ongoing attempt to provide more visibility by tagging bugs and requests (which looks a bit like one request I made) and @BrennanSingularSound is currently tagging existing bugs/requests.
This is what I would qualify as the bottom-up approach. We will have an idea of the content of next releases by analyzing the tags.
I also proposed at some point the other way round, the top-down approach, by maintaining a kind of rolling log of features.
I would have thought the latter to be simpler to maintain and read (and even more integrated with their current way to publish release sheets along with new firmware), but maybe I 'm wrong, and I won’t complain as I requested both 
…
So now waiting for that one to be tagged or marked as duplicate or something 
…