Ben Cajon kit - as requested

As requested.

1 Like

wow, that was fast! thank you so much…
as a soloist playing acoustic 20X a mo, any other kits you would suggest for me?

I cant download it when I click this file. How can I bet the Cajon file? Thank you

I just checked and the zip file is available. Check that your firewall is not preventing you from downloading the file from Dropbox.

…how I can get this cajon zip? …on dropbox it is not available…
thanks
Ali

It is available:

Yes , click on the files name, than you will see a arrow on top right, click on it, than login , than download

thanl…with firefox is it not possible…now I used m-edge…then was the download possible

When can we expect an HD version of this Cajon? :grinning_face:
I’d be willing to donate some $. Who’s with me?

Hello. There are several issues that would be encountered with responding to your request:

  1. The original kit was posted by a member who has not been seen on the Forum for quite some time. Hence, I found the kit in my archives and reposted to the Forum for all current users to be able to access, should they want it. I would assume that the original author is not around and would have no intention of updating the kit, but should he see this, and wish to tell me I am wrong, I would be happy, and it would be great to see his efforts at producing an HD kit.

  2. I could likely produce an HD kit but for two problems. 1) I do not own a cajon. 2) I have not yet purchased a BB2, and have not really seen a need for having a BB2.

  3. Those things being said, there are cajon resources available in digital form. 8Dio makes a Kontakt instrument, and it is actually available for free, at this time. I, or anyone else, could produce samples from it and build a new cajon kit. It, of course, would not sound exactly like the Benjo kit, as it is not that same cajon.

  4. Then there is the matter of compensation. What do you think would be fair for someone to be paid to develop such a kit, realizing, of course that you could spread this fee over several users who would contribute to seeing it get built?

and finally,

  1. The existing kit is a 90mb kit. That is already a fairly comprehensive build. What gains are you expecting to see from a higher definition kit. Would you wand just a greater depth of sampling, or would you want additional articulations of the cajon? Either of these might present problems in creating a build from a plug-in. If you are expecting a build from actual playing, the production costs would be substantial.